Recent News

Ask a Question
Home > Unfair Dismissal > Can you be dismissed for time fraud?

Can you be dismissed for time fraud?

Stealing from your employer. What starts as a minor breach of your employment contract or company polices of taking time, taking home goods that have no value, grows into more serious issues. Perils of ChatGPT is another issue as employers use complex AI tech to keep track of you. Can you be dismissed for time fraud is important reading. Lets be honest we have all been late, gone home early or conducted private affairs in the employers time. Be aware of what could happen.

Can you be dismissed for time fraud?

Time fraud, or in other words, taking work breaks for longer than you are entitled to, can be a valid reason for dismissal in Australia. The Fair Work Commission states that workers are entitled to work breaks. But how many breaks can you have? And for how long? And when does taking too long on a break constitute time fraud, and therefore, dismissal? Can you be dismissed for time fraud? can have serious consequences

In this article, we answer all these questions. And we share a recent unfair dismissal case that will help you understand how the Fair Work Commission decides when excessively long breaks constitute time fraud and fair dismissal.

Guarding against time fraud: What breaks are Australian employees entitled to?

Some employers take a liberal attitude to employee breaks. They therefore may not call out an employee for taking more time than they are officially entitled to. But it’s important to remember that other employers aren’t so kind with taking longer breaks. And because they are paying for those extra, unentitled minutes, it can be considered time fraud.

Therefore, to ensure you aren’t at risk of committing time fraud, it’s important to understand what you are legally entitled to. The Fair Work Commission states that during a work period (for example, an eight-hour work day), workers can be entitled to paid or unpaid:

  • Rest breaks, which are generally ten minutes in length.
  • Meal breaks, which are often 30 minutes to an hour in length.
  • Split shifts, which are often granted to employees who work long hours. This entitles them to a break that can be several hours long, with the aim to break up their work periods. For example, the Restaurant Award allows for an employee to have a split shift if each of their working periods are two hours or longer.    

In the majority of instances, an employee is entitled to take a break after working five consecutive hours. However, depending on the work you are performing, it may not be reasonable to take a break only after five hours.

Can-you-be-dismissed-for-time fraud?-Cheating-becomes-a-trap.
Cheating becomes a trap. The relationship with the employer has to be a “two way street”. Employees have to maintain the trust and confidence of the employer.

Guarding against time fraud: How do I find out my break entitlements?

It’s important to remember that employers have strict workplace health and safety obligations to make sure a worker is provided the opportunity to take their legally entitled breaks. The type and length of break that you are entitled to generally depends on the hours that you work. Also, the type of work you are performing and industry you are in employed in.

Whether these breaks are paid or unpaid often comes down to these factors too, in addition to your employment type (full-time, part-time or casual). To find out how many breaks you are entitled to take during your work period, and for how long, you can check one of three documents. Either your award, enterprise agreement or employment contract.

You can also use the Fair Work Commission’s interactive tool to find out your break entitlements based on the industry that you work in. Checking these resources can help you know exactly how long you can take breaks for. With this knowledge, you can therefore avoid any risk of committing time fraud.

Time fraud goes both ways. Employers also steal in the sence of wage theft in asking you to work, do undertake extra hours for no pay. You are entitled to say no. This can get more murky if its a flexible work hours arrangment.

Can you be fairly dismissed for exceeding your break entitlements?

The Fair Work Commission has adjudicated on many unfair dismissal cases concerning employees who were dismissed for alleged time fraud. And the lessons we can glean from these is that to be fairly dismissed for time fraud, it must be consistent, repeated behaviour. Also, the amount of time the employee had spent on their breaks in excess of their legal entitlements must be significant.

If you spent longer than you were entitled on a break, and were dismissed for it, it’s highly likely that the Fair Work Commission would rule it an unfair dismissal. However, if you repeatedly exceeded your break entitlements, there’s a good chance that it would be ruled as fair.

“This is bullsh*t:” Worker is dismissed for committing time fraud

The dangers of committing time fraud were illustrated in the recent unfair dismissal case Karl McKeown v The Smith’s Snackfood Company Pty Ltd [2023]. Maintenance technician Karl McKeown had been working at The Smith Snackfood Company for over eight years when he was noticed taking an extra-long break. He was soon summoned to a meeting where he was asked if he had been given permission to go off-site.

And if so, whether he had taken his break afterwards, which would have exceeded his 30-minute break allowance under the company’s enterprise agreement. However, Mr McKeown didn’t take lightly the implication that he had committed time fraud. After explaining that he went off-site to grab lunch for his co-workers, he walked out while saying “this is bullsh*t.”

Some employees see taking from their employers as a non cash benefit. (thinking the employer has plenty of money anyway) Is it a scam?, is it fraud?, Be careful, you cannot take what does not belong to you.

Mr McKeown is suspended for time fraud, workplace investigation is conducted   

Following Mr McKeown’s abrupt walkout, Smith Snackfood reviewed the preceding week’s CCTV footage. It discovered that Mr McKeown had taken extra-long breaks for the entire week. He was thereafter verbally notified that he was being suspended pending a workplace investigation.

The workplace investigation concluded that there was sufficient evidence that Mr McKeown had committed time fraud. It deemed that it was “improbable” that Mr McKeown “did not know that his breaks were well in excess of the site agreement.” The company found that his penchant for taking extra-long breaks was “deliberate conduct as it was repeated behaviour.”

Mr McKeown is dismissed for time fraud, makes unfair dismissal claim

Smith Snackfood therefore summarily dismissed Mr McKeown for serious misconduct. And he subsequently made an unfair dismissal with the Fair Work Commission.

At his unfair dismissal hearing, Mr McKeown expressed remorse for taking extra-long breaks. And that he wasn’t aware he had been doing so. He also laid forth a number of reasons why his dismissal for time fraud was unfair. He argued that:

  • He was denied procedural fairness during Smith Snackfood’s workplace investigation. Namely, because his request to have a support person present during his meeting management was refused. And that he wasn’t provided with the CCTV footage and other documents he required to make a response to the allegations. Also, that he wasn’t told of the reasons for his dismissal in clear and explicit terms.
  • Regarding the extra-long break he took and was initially questioned about, he had been getting banh mi’s for his colleagues. Mr McKeown argued that this was a team custom dating back to 2019 that aimed to improve morale. He said that it replaced the Thursday barbecue the team had in place for over ten years under previous management.
  • He had sworn in the meeting because he felt it was “going in circles’ and that he was being treated in a “bullying fashion.” Mr McKeown said that he felt he was a victim for something that had previously been approved by management.
Employee is stressed out. Has to front HR, now worried he will be dismissed. Constantly late to work.

Employee had permission

He had been given permission to go off-site on several other days during the week in question. This meant that he had only taken extra-long breaks on three occasions. His dismissal was a disproportionate response to his alleged time fraud. He felt that instead of a dismissal, he should have been given a warning.

  • His dismissal was “too harsh” because he had a track record of working “diligently and responsibly.” Mr McKeown also argued that it was harsh given his age and skills, and the fact that finding new employment would be difficult.
  • Smith Snackfood shouldn’t have used CCTV to monitor his breaks and believed that they had a “hidden agenda.”
  • His alleged time fraud didn’t meet the Fair Work Commission’s standard for serious misconduct. Namely, that it was wilful or deliberate behaviour not consistent with his employment contract.

Employer makes its case at the Fair Work Commission

At the unfair dismissal hearing, Smith Snackfood made a much simpler argument to justify Mr McKeown’s dismissal as fair. It argued that Mr McKeown:

  • Was provided with procedural fairness during its workplace investigation into the alleged time fraud
  • Was never provided permission to extend his breaks when he went off-site.
  • Had displayed “disrespectful behaviour” and “inappropriate conduct” by swearing and walking out of his meeting with Smith Snackfood management.
  • Knowingly and wilfully committed time fraud by taking extra-long breaks.
  • Had exhibited behaviour that that was dishonest and lacked integrity. And therefore, it struck at the heart of the employment relationship. This caused Smith Snackfood to irredeemably lose confidence and trust in him.
Employer going through the details. Many employees take liberties, ie fill their care up with petrol, thinking it doesn’t matter.

Time fraud or not? The Fair Work Commission rules on the unfair dismissal case

Weighing up both arguments, the Fair Work Commission found that Smith Snackfood had a valid reason to dismiss Mr McKeown for serious misconduct. It stated that there was significant evidence that he had committed time fraud.

The Fair Work Commission found that:

  • Smith Snackfood had provided Mr McKeown with procedural fairness during its workplace investigation.
  • The paid breaks Mr McKeown took were “significantly beyond” the stipulations set out in Smith Snackfood’s enterprise agreement. The Fair Work Commission noted that over a five-day period, they were “frequent and repeated.” This therefore constituted time fraud.
  • There were 10 occasions when Mr McKeown had taken extra-long breaks. This ranged from 20 minutes longer per day up to 50 minutes longer. The Fair Work Commission deemed this a “deliberate and wilful flaunting” of the trust of Smith Snackfood.
  • Smith Snackfood employees were relied upon to manage their own breaks. The Fair Work Commission rejected Mr McKeown’s argument that he was unaware of the length of his breaks.
  • Mr McKeown was a union delegate, and as such, should have been “well aware” of his break entitlements under Smith Snackfood’s enterprise agreement. And that by exceeding them, that he was committing time fraud.
  • Mr McKeown’s assertion that he should have been given a warning instead of being dismissed was flawed. Namely, because he “deliberately” exhibited conduct that was “deceptive.”

In summation, the Fair Work Commission found that Mr McKeown’s time fraud was a valid reason for his dismissal. That is, because his conduct was “wilful and deceptive.” The Fair Work Commission noted that lacking Mr McKeown’s “repeated and excessive” instances of time fraud, his dismissal would have been ruled unfair.

Employee working from home. How this is monitored for hours worked has been controversal.

Employers can commit time fraud too

Cases of employees committing time fraud, like that of Mr McKeown, are certainly out there. But time fraud can go the other way too. Employers are sometimes known to pressure workers to skip their legally entitled breaks or work unpaid overtime. A recent study reveals that the average Australian employees work an average of 4.3 unpaid extra hours per week. The study reveals that these extra hours equate to $93 billion per year. Or on a per worker basis, around $8,000. This certainly qualifies as time fraud by employers, conducted on a massive scale.

This data, however, is based on the hours of the average Australian worker. Full-time employees give away even more of their time for free – on average a full hour per day. That equates to around six weeks of unpaid work per year. Often, employers might maintain a culture of fear within the workplace that pressures employees to work unpaid hours. If they don’t, they may be seen as “not being a team player.” Or even, “not living up to a high-performance culture.”

By knowing your legally entitled breaks, and standing up for your rights, you can ensure that time fraud isn’t committed against you by your employer.

Agreement in writing.

Have you been unfairly dismissed?

If you have been unfairly dismissed for alleged time fraud, you have the means to take action through the Fair Work Commission. We at A Whole New Approach can help you make an unfair dismissal claim to gain reinstatement to your role. Or financial compensation. But remember, you need to act fast. You must make your unfair dismissal claim with the Fair Work Commission within 21 days of your dismissal. With A Whole New Approach, you can rely on a team of highly experience workplace mediators who have been helping Australian workers for more than two decades.

We’ve handled more than 16,000 unfair dismissal cases in our time, with an excitement track record of helping workers achieve a successful outcome. With all this experience, we can navigate you through the often complex process of making a claim. And we can explain everything you need to know in an easy-to-understand way. Additionally, we offer a risk-free guarantee, meaning you only pay if we successfully win your case, so you don’t have to worry about costs. We also offer a free initial consultation to educate you on your rights and explore all available options.

Facing a workplace investigation or serious misconduct allegations we can act as a support person for you or draft a response to the allegations

Get in touch with us at 1800 333 666 for a private discussion and let us assist you in fighting for justice.

Articles similar to: Can you be dismissed for time fraud?

Dismissed if you don’t follow the employers directive

Unfair to dismiss an employee for being late

When is misconduct considered work related

Misconduct a employee guide

More to explore

Employee Rights

Trans rights in the workplace

Trans issues in the workplace: 4 controversial cases Trans rights in the workplace has become an increasingly discussed topic in recent times. In 2022, the

Employee Rights

Flexible work arrangements What’s Next?

Flexible work arrangements bend to new work standards or snap under pressure? Since the rise and fall of Covid-19 almost every industry has arranged some

Unfair Dismissal

Worker dismissed for headbutting door

Unfair to expect angelic from mere humans: Fair Work A custody officer fired for headbutting a door in frustration has won his unfair dismissal case.

Employee Rights

Sexual Assault and harassment at Work

What is the difference? To differentiate sexual harassment and sexual assault can be challenging. Due to the scope of both crimes an individual may be

workplace-turned-into-a -crime-scene
Employee Rights

Violence in the workplace:

Workplace violence: 6 examples from around the world Violence in the workplace may be more common than you think. Research by SafeWork Australia reveals that

Unfair Dismissal

Working around workplace relationships

Smirking, rolling of eyes, or even smiling can lead to trouble Working around workplace relationships can be difficult. Every boss, manager, and employer will interact

    Get In Touch


    Unfair Dismissals Australia is an industry leader. We strictly represent employees regarding issues to do with fair work. We are available 7 days a week.