Recent News

Ask a Question
Home > General Protections > Gravely ill worker wins $238K general protections claim

Gravely ill worker wins $238K general protections claim

Gravely-ill-worker-wins-$238K-general protections-claim.-Dismissed-for-being-ill.
Bullied for being ill. This type of behaviour by employers has to stop. Being dismissed for being ill is even worse. Many injured or ill employees hang onto their jobs, its what they have to look forward to. Gravely ill worker wins and so they should.

Gravely ill worker wins $238K general protections claim

A general protections claim has seen a stone mason win $238,231 after his ruthless employer dismissed him due to his terminal illness. The 43-year-old had been diagnosed with silicosis – a long-term lung disease caused by inhaling dangerous levels of silica dust – which he’d developed over his 25 years of service with the employer. Gravely ill worker wins $238K is worth reading so you know your rights. Information is power, also a lot of employees settle claims for far less than what is possible available to them.

Ruthless discrimination and dismissal

This unlawful dismissal case – Ruttley v Willis Brothers Installation (Qld) Pty Ltd [2022] – is a shocking example of an employer ruthlessly discriminating against an employee based on their disability. The employee was forced to continue working to excessive levels and was bullied mercilessly for his disease. He was also denied his pay and entitlements, before finally being dismissed. Let’s look at the events of this frankly unbelievable case and how the Federal court came to a rightful decision.

General protections claim: Stone mason dismissed due to work-related lung disease

Timothy Ruttley had commenced working for Gold Coast based Willis Bros Installations in 1997 as an 18-year-old apprentice stone mason. The company had been established by Duncan and Justin Wills in the same year. Mr Ruttley worked 12-hour days inside a factory grinding and cutting stone bench tops.

Not only was Mr Ruttley not paid overtime, but for the first 12 months of his apprenticeship, he wasn’t provided with a face mask. Nor was it mandatory to wear one. He finished his apprenticeship in 2001, when Willis Bros installed industrial ceiling fans to help suck silica dust from the factory floor. Key to this general protections case was that despite these belated safety measures, the factory in which Mr Ruttley worked was still dangerously risky to his health. The fans lacked filters, so airborne dust particles still circulated in the air.

Some employers work is their obsession. Good luck to them. This doesn’t mean they can mistreat, discriminate against the workforce. Who don’t come up to the lofty standards they set for themselves.

Employee diagnosed with terminal lung disease amid industry epidemic  

By 2013, Mr Ruttley had been promoted to the position of director and had become a significant shareholder in Willis Bros, along with its founders Duncan and Justin. He owned a 17% stake in the company and was now paid the same annual salary as the brothers following an agreement made in 2013.

Fast forward to 2017 and Work Health and Safety Queensland started to increase their inspections of stone benchtop factories. This came after a number of stone benchtop workers were diagnosed with silicosis. Work Safe Queensland soon ordered all those diagnosed with silicosis to cease performing work in an environment containing silica dust. This saw 48 workers prohibited from attending work by the end of 2018.

In November 2018, Mr Ruttley underwent a CT scan and was diagnosed with lymph node silicosis. In his general protections court hearing, Mr Ruttley said that the doctor told him that he had a “terminal disease which I was required to monitor and manage for the rest of my life.”

The doctor told Mr Ruttley that it was difficult to predict his prognosis. He outlined treatment options for him, including a lung transplant and a procedure to flush out the lungs to remove the silica dust. Mr Ruttley said that the diagnosis left him overwhelmed and scared about his future.What’s more, Mr Ruttley’s brother Simon, who also worked at Willis Bros, was also diagnosed with silicosis.

“Get back on the f**king tools:” Employers insensitive response to terminal diagnosis

Shortly after his diagnosis, Mr Ruttley made a worker’s compensation claim with WorkCover, which was accepted in January 2019. In his general protections claim, Mr Ruttley stated that despite his life-threatening diagnosis, he continued to work long hours as December was a busy period. Due to a staff shortage, he was required to reschedule jobs and extend installations, which caused significant irritation to Willis Bros founder Duncan Willis.

After speaking to a customer about a delayed job, Mr Willis went to Mr Ruttley and told him to “get back on the tools” to complete the job. When Mr Ruttley said he couldn’t “because of his silicosis,” Mr Willis simply yelled “get back on the f….g tools.”

Being loaded up with work. The moment you stumble by being sick, ill or injured, your days are numbered.

“What worries me is f***king you guys with silicosis:” The employment relationship deteriorates

In his general protections court hearing, Mr Ruttley said that he and his brother Simon met with Mr Willis in June 2019 to discuss the business. In particular, the fact that many employees were on leave due to silicosis. During this conversation, Mr Willis expressed his very insensitive views on this situation, sharing his frustration with the lack of workers available.

“I’ll tell you I will be honest with you what worries me is f***king you guys with silicosis,” Duncan told Mr Ruttley and his brother. “I’m the only one here without it. Everyone is pointing their f**king finger at me. F**king poor Luke’s got it. You guys have got it.” This quote is just one among many in which Mr Willis abused Mr Ruttley for his silicosis diagnosis. In his general protections hearing, Mr Ruttley said Mr Willis often referred to him as a “f**kwit” or “f**king idiot,” causing him to feel belittled.

In June 2019, Simon was made redundant and as a result, Mr Ruttley’s workload increased. He asked Duncan for assistance, but he simply ordered him to “get back on the tools” despite being aware of his silicosis diagnosis. Mr Ruttley continued to suffer from extreme stress due to the abuse and increased workload.

Look after yourself, your health and welbeing should always come first. Its a employee right to feel safe.

“How are these dogs sitting at home nothing wrong with them?:” Employer continues his abuse

Key to this general protections case was Mr Willis’ general attitude toward Mr Ruttley’s silicosis diagnosis, as well as that of other workers. In one exchange, he said to Mr Ruttley: “how are these dogs sitting at home nothing wrong with them?”

Mr Ruttley responded that the workers “did have something wrong with them.” Mr Willis simply ignored the reply and continued making derogatory remarks. In his general protections claim, Mr Ruttley said he felt stressed at work due to the way Mr Willis was treating him, along with his excessive workload.

“I want my f**king shares back you hear me:” Mr Ruttley is continually bullied

The deterioration in Mr Ruttley’s relationship with Mr Willis culminated on 14 January 2020. On that morning, Mr Willis entered Mr Ruttley’s office without greeting him and said: “I want my f**king shares back you hear me.” He then loudly slammed the desk with his hand, causing it to rattle and startle Mr Ruttley. Mr Willis then exited his office without uttering another word. Hours later, Mr Ruttley received an email from Mr Willis requesting that he surrender the company car driven by his wife.

What happened next was a key moment in this general protections case. Deeply disturbed by what had just happened, Mr Ruttley went to see his doctor. The doctor issued him with a medical certificate that said he was “suffering from workplace stress and will be unfit for duty up to and including 14 February 2020.”

Toxic work environments are to be avoided. Look for a place to work where your support when ill. Where employees and employers support each other.

Mr Employee is denied pay, leave and is finally dismissed  

When Mr Ruttley emailed the medical certificate to Mr Willis, it set in motion a number of events that took place up until his dismissal in May 2020. During this time, Mr Willis:  

  • Requested Mr Ruttley surrender his other company car and told him that Willis Bros wouldn’t pay his licence allowance while he was on sick leave.
  • Reduced Mr Ruttley’s wage, disconnected his mobile phone and cancelled his fuel card.  
  • Stopped paying Mr Ruttley’s weekly wage. He also claimed Mr Ruttley had used up all his accrued leave.
  • When asked by Mr Ruttley for a conciliation of his leave entitlements, he refused to honour this request.
  • Removed Mr Ruttley as a director of Willis Bros from 1 May 2020.

On 11 May, Mr Ruttley was dismissed for having taken excessive leave. He subsequently made a general protections claim with the Fair Work Commission.

Federal Court rules on general protections case

Mr Ruttley’s general protections case was heard in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia in August 2022. Mr Ruttley alleged that Willis Bros had dismissed him for two reasons. Namely, because he had:

  • Exercised a workplace right in submitting a workers compensation claim.
  • Exercised a workplace right by making a complaint or inquiry regarding payment of his leave entitlements.
  • Suffered from a physical disability. Namely, lymph node silicosis.

Under the general protections provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, exercising a workplace right is a reason that employers are prohibited from using to dismiss an employee. Discriminating against an employee due to their disability is also a prohibited reason.

Judge Tonkin found that Mr Willis had attempted to exit Mr Ruttley from the company upon learning that he couldn’t continue working due to his diagnosis. And she found that Mr Willis dismissed him due to his physical disability. Willis Bros was ordered to pay Mr Ruttley $162,631. This comprised of $142,631 for historic economic loss and $20,000 for distress, hurt and humiliation.

Dismissed and out the door. Dismissed while ill or injured is unlawful. Adverse action and general protections claims are on the increase.

Employer forced to pay Mr Ruttley a further $75,600 for general protections breaches

In November 2022, Judge Tonkin made her decision concerning how Willis Bros should be fined for its general protections breaches. With regard to the company dismissing Mr Ruttley due to his disability and making a worker’s compensation claim, Jude Tonkin fined Willis Bros $44,100. She said that Mr Willis had acted in a “deliberate not inadvertent” manner and also that he had no remorse. She said that he had “maintained he was justified in terminating [Mr Rutely’s] employment.”

In regard to Willis Bros taking adverse action against Mr Ruttley after he inquired about his leave entitlements, Judge Tonkin fined the company $31,500. She said that the combined fine of $75,600 “should be one that deters” Willis Bros from mistreating any employees who develop silicosis in the future. In all, Mr Ruttley’s general protections claim saw Willis Bros pay him a combined $238,231.

All employees matter. Gravely ill worker wins, and so they should. Always get advice before you settle.

Conclusion to: Gravely ill worker wins $238K general protections claim

Are you a victim of workplace discrimination or bullying?

We at A Whole New Approach are Australia’s leading workplace mediators. We have over 20 years’ experience helping workers in every state and territory stand up to workplace discrimination and bullying. Our friendly team can simplify the process of making a general protections claim with the Fair Work Commission. And we can provide the expert advice you need to ensure it’s a success. We are proud of our staff and the outcomes they achieve for our clients. Plus, you can take advantage of our no win, no fee service and a free initial consultation.

All issues of employee rights, casual employment, sick leave, being sacked, anything related to the workplace.

Call us today on 1800 333 666 for a no-obligation discussion about your circumstances.

Articles similar to: Gravely ill worker wins $238K general protections claim

General protections application

Dismissed for complaining worker wins

What is my general protections case worth

More to explore

Employee Rights

Trans rights in the workplace

Trans issues in the workplace: 4 controversial cases Trans rights in the workplace has become an increasingly discussed topic in recent times. In 2022, the

Employee Rights

Flexible Work Arrangements What’s Next?

Flexible work arrangements bend to new work standards or snap under pressure? Since the rise and fall of Covid-19 almost every industry has arranged some

Unfair Dismissal

Worker dismissed for headbutting door

Unfair to expect angelic from mere humans: Fair Work A custody officer fired for headbutting a door in frustration has won his unfair dismissal case.

Employee Rights

Sexual Assault and harassment at Work

What is the difference? To differentiate sexual harassment and sexual assault can be challenging. Due to the scope of both crimes an individual may be

workplace-turned-into-a -crime-scene
Employee Rights

Violence in the workplace:

Workplace violence: 6 examples from around the world Violence in the workplace may be more common than you think. Research by SafeWork Australia reveals that

Unfair Dismissal

Working around workplace relationships

Smirking, rolling of eyes, or even smiling can lead to trouble Working around workplace relationships can be difficult. Every boss, manager, and employer will interact

    Get In Touch


    Unfair Dismissals Australia is an industry leader. We strictly represent employees regarding issues to do with fair work. We are available 7 days a week.