Recent News

Ask a Question
Home > workplace investigations > Employees’ silence – Aggressive negotiation or blackmail?

Employees’ silence – Aggressive negotiation or blackmail?


Negotiations can take various forms. Careful its not for the worse, dismissal, criminal charges, defemination.

Employees’ silence – Aggressive negotiation or blackmail?

In considering Employees’ silence – Aggressive negotiation or blackmail? In the recent unfair dismissal case of Jason Richardston v Action Traffic Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission has upheld the dismissal of a traffic management supervisor who allegedly asked his employer for $50,000 to “go away quietly”. This bargaining or negotiation attempt occurred after the employment relationship had soured. After the employees’ refusal to be on-call on weekends. Subsequently, the employee was terminated and the unfair dismissal matter was heard by Deputy President Lake in the Fair Work Commission. Employees’ silence – Aggressive negotiation or blackmail? should be compulsory reading.

Meaning of blackmail

to make threats to harm a company or organization if they do not do something you want, such as give you money:

In your negotiations or demands, lets say for better salary or conditions, be careful how the message is relayed, and more importantly how its perceived or received. Threats or being tough may get you some short term gains, but be carful of the long term consequences. Some employers never forget, and the day of payback may come.

Background of Negotiation Tactics

The Applicant commenced his employment with the Respondent on 6 August 2018. This was as a Operations Supervisor with a salary of $52,000. At that time, the Applicant states that there was no mention of a requirement to be on call outside of hours. The Respondent’s business underwent a restructure in 2018 and the Applicant was appointed to the position of Regional Supervisor of the Sunshine Coast and Gympie Region on 10 December 2018. With an increased salary of $75,000.

Nevertheless the Applicant asserts that again no mention was made of the need to be on call until shortly before Christmas in 2018, when he was informed that he would be included in the on-call roster. He claims that he did this work unpaid, out of loyalty to Mr Kelly, on the basis that it would be short term.

On 11 May 2020, the Applicant asked Mr Kelly to remove him from the on-call roster because of the negative effect it was having on his family and his mental wellbeing. The Applicant stated that his continued participation in the on-call roster would result in his divorce. Mr Kelly responded to that remark with words to the effect of “don’t put that on me”.

Mr Kelly did remove the Applicant from the roster from late March 2020. Even though that decision placed an additional burden on the other staff, who began complaining to Mr Kelly that the Applicant was receiving special treatment.

Careful through the process, your perceived tough approach is considered bullying tactics. In turn it justifies your dismissal, a workplace investigation or some other sanction.

Current position was at risk

On 30 July 2020, whilst in the vehicle with the Applicant, the Respondent agrees that he told the Applicant that his current position was at risk if he did not return to the on-call roster. He also agrees that the Applicant had indicated he would not return to that roster due to the pressure his wife was putting on him.

On the morning of 3 August 2020, Mr Kelly emailed the Applicant giving him until close of business that day to inform him whether he had reconsidered his position over the weekend. It was accepted that email referred to whether he would return to the on-call roster or accept an alternative position.

Employee wants $50,000 to go away quietly

The Applicant engaged Paul Cradden of the Australian Workers Union to have discussions with the business on his behalf. Those discussions took place on 4 August 2020, between Mr Kelly and Mr Cradden. At that meeting, the only options put forward by Mr Cradden to resolve the matter was either reinstate the Applicant in his previous position, without requiring him to participate in the on call roster. Or pay him $50,000 “to go away quietly”.

Employees’ silence – Aggressive negotiation or blackmail?

The Respondent viewed this demand as “emotional blackmail boarding [sic] on extortion” and a betrayal. Later that day, Mr Kelly contacted the Applicant to inform him that his employment was terminated effective immediately. That he would receive three weeks’ pay in lieu of notice. Deputy President Lake held that there was a valid reason for dismissal. That it was not harsh, unjust or unreasonable in the circumstances, regarding the refusal to participate in an on call roster.

Employees’-silence-Aggressive- negotiation-or-blackmail?
Employees’ silence – Aggressive negotiation or blackmail? Be careful. Its important to maintain the trust and confidence of the employer. Don’t let it lead to dismissal

Employees’ silence – Aggressive negotiation or blackmail?

This case demonstrates that when an employment relationship encounters turbulence and it may not longer be viable for an employee to remain employed. The manner in which employees negotiate their exit or severance packages, may be considered blackmail or extortion.

In the unfair dismissal case of Heydon v The Highgate Group Pty Limited. An employee’s summary dismissal was upheld after he tried to extort money from his employer. Then deliberately withheld information about work health and safety (WHS) issues, forcing his employer to shut down a site for 1.5 days.

Since approximately March 2017, the employee complained about the employer’s compliance with its WHS obligations. About two months after his initial WHS complaint, the employee wrote to the CEO stating that he had lodged a general protections application. The FWC and intended to file an application for prosecution with SafeWork.

Without prejudice negotiations

The employee went on to write that he was “prepared to engage in without prejudice discussions to negotiate a mutual separation” before lodging the Safe Work application. Further the employee stated that if an agreement could be reached, he would also withdraw his general protections application. The employee subsequently provided the general manager with his proposal for a separation amount. This totaled more than $85,000. This was rejected by the employer.

It was held that the employee sought to bring pressure to bear on the Company to secure a separation agreement that involved a large payment. With the intention of harming the Company had it not been fulfilled. As serious misconduct includes harm to the reputation of the employer. Deputy President Booth held that this blackmail or extortion was sufficiently serious to justify immediate dismissal.


Lessons for employees

If your relationship with your employer has been turbulent and you are considering a separation or severance package. Be mindful when attempting to negotiate your exit on your own. Utilizing sensitive information to blackmail. Extort or compel your employer to pay you out. Will not be highly regarded should the matter be heard before the Fair Work Commission. Instead, engaging a representative may assist an employee in negotiating a settlement or exit package with their employer. We can help. We consistently get employees stating “tell the Employer if i don’t get i want i will go to the TV stations”. Is this blackmail?, or legalized extortion? Or just tough negotiation tactics by an aggrieved employee who believes the Employer has done the wrong thing ?

A Whole New Approach, an independent body of workplace advisors and paid agents. We can assist you in drafting your unfair dismissal claim or application to a Federal Court standard. Run the conciliation conferences, run arbitrations and negotiate on your behalf. Although we would act as your advocate, we provide even handed, honest advice in regards to the prospects of your case.

By drafting your claim properly from the beginning, it demonstrates that you understand the legislation. How the Respondent has contravened these provisions and thus when negotiating a settlement or remedy. The Fair work Commission and the opposing party will take you more seriously and be more inclined to settle.  Nevertheless, we are experienced negotiators and we know what tactics or approach is acceptable in every circumstance to ensure we achieve the best possible settlement for our clients.

Salary blackmail is on the increase. Employees are demanding higher salaries because of the labor shortage. Careful through negotiation of that adage “jumping from the pan into the fire”. Is putting pressure on your employer to your long term determent?

Conclusion to Employees’ silence – Aggressive negotiation or blackmail?

I hope the article Employees’ silence – Aggressive negotiation or blackmail? has been helpful to you. It can be very emotional times when your jobs in jeopardy. Give us a call on 1800 333 666 to discuss, its cost you nothing to make the call. Find out how strong your case is, what’s it worth, explore your options. We are A Whole New Approach P/L, leaders in workplace advice and representation, looking for a lawyer? consider us, we are not lawyers , but have 30 years experience, this work is all we do, we are experts. 200 blogs published here alone (and counting!), plus we run other web sites giving advice.

All Fair work matters, including serious misconduct, workplace investigations, casual employee rights, call today

Articles relating to: Employees’ silence – Aggressive negotiation or blackmail?

Buyers remorse in negotiations click here

Negotiating with your employer to get what you want, click here

Negotiating: hard bargaining or extortion, click here

Probation periods the good bad and the ugly click here

More to explore

Unfair Dismissal

Can you be terminated for resisting change?

Can inflexibility get you dismissed? Workplace flexibility in recent times has become synonymous with things like working from home and flexible hours. However, past Fair

Employee Rights

Psychosocial hazards at work

Psychosocial hazards at work Psychosocial hazards are aspects of work that have the potential to cause psychological or physical harm. This can include hazards like

Overweight-employeewho-has been-fat-shamed
Unfair Dismissal

When fat-shaming gets you dismissed

Be careful what you say in the workplace A recent unfair dismissal case heard by the Fair Work Commission provides a stark reminder that you


Redundancy pay cut for rejecting redeployment

Pay cut for snubbing reasonable alternative employment When faced with redundancy, many workers may not realise that rejecting an offer of reasonable alternative employment could

Employee Rights

What can an employer insist on?

Physical appearance in the workplace and dismissals In Australia, an employer has the right to insist that an employee maintains certain standards regarding their appearance.

Employee Rights

Trans rights in the workplace

Trans issues in the workplace: 4 controversial cases Trans rights in the workplace has become an increasingly discussed topic in recent times. In 2022, the

    Get In Touch


    Unfair Dismissals Australia is an industry leader. We strictly represent employees regarding issues to do with fair work. We are available 7 days a week.