18 dismissals from around the world

From the unusual to the outright bizarre, these 18 dismissal cases offer a glimpse into the complexities of employment law and the evolving challenges employers and employees face. As social norms and technologies continue to change, the line between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour in the workplace continues to blur. What these cases make clear is that both employers and employees need to remain aware of how actions, even those that may seem trivial or unrelated to work, can have significant employment consequences.

By delving into these extraordinary stories, we not only gain an insight into human behaviour but also see the complex web of legal, ethical, and social issues that modern workplaces must navigate. The only certainty is that as society and technology continue to evolve, employment law will undoubtedly continue to deliver cases that both baffle and fascinate us.

In the world of employment law, cases often range from common issues of unfair dismissal to disputes over benefits and workplace harassment. However, every so often, a case comes along that is so bizarre or unusual that it catches the public’s attention and sometimes even sets a legal precedent. Here’s a look at 18 such cases that pushed the boundaries of what employers and employees thought possible.

1. The “Selfie Stick” Case

In an era where smartphones are attached to us, the line between personal and professional life is increasingly blurred. One employee found this out the hard way when they were dismissed for using a selfie stick to capture photos inside a secure work environment. This case was more than just a matter of personal indiscretion; it raised crucial issues about workplace security and the acceptable limits of personal technology on company premises.

2. Tweeting Away a Job

Social media is a double-edged sword. In one case, an employee tweeted negative remarks about the town she was about to move to for her job. Her prospective employer saw the tweets and promptly rescinded the job offer. This incident sparked a conversation about the extent to which personal social media activity can or should affect professional opportunities.

3. Moonlighting as a Clown

Work-life balance is one thing, but what about leading a double life as a clown while on medical leave? An employee was sacked after it was discovered they were moonlighting as a clown at children’s parties despite being on medical leave for stress and anxiety from their fulltime job. This raised questions around medical leave abuse and the authenticity of the employee’s claims.

4. The YouTube Rant

In an act of what some might consider career suicide, an employee filmed a rant about her job and her boss, posting it on YouTube. She was subsequently sacked for violating the company’s policy on social media use. The case served as a cautionary tale about the consequences of oversharing online.

5. Hot Sauce Fiasco

Pranks and humour often lighten up the workplace, but they can also cross lines. In one instance, an employee was dismissed for adding an extremely spicy hot sauce to a coworker’s food. The co-worker had an adverse reaction, leading to assault charges against the prankster. This case raised questions about the boundaries of workplace humour and when a prank becomes an act of violence.

6. Psychic Predictions

In one of the most peculiar cases on this list, a female employee informed her employer that her psychic had foreseen a violent event occurring in the workplace. Concerned about this prediction, the employer decided to terminate her employment. This led to a heated debate on whether employers should take such claims seriously and the grounds for dismissal based on unusual or unprovable assertions.

7. Disrespecting the National Anthem

Nationalism and workplace norms collided in India when several employees were dismissed for not standing up during the national anthem at a corporate function. While some argued that the act showed a lack of respect, others claimed it was an infringement on personal freedoms.

8. Too Much Cologne

While it’s common knowledge that excessive perfume or cologne can be distracting, one employee found out that it could also be a dismissable offense. His strong cologne led to allergic reactions among coworkers, resulting in his dismissal. The case led to questions around personal grooming and how it intersects with workplace wellness and comfort.

9. The Potato Salad Incident

An employee was dismissed after taking what was deemed to be an excessively large portion of potato salad during a company picnic. The employer argued that this act showed poor judgment and could be indicative of the employee’s overall character, leading to dismissal. The employee bit off more than they could chew!

10. The Vampire Défense

Employers have grown more understanding about accommodating religious and lifestyle practices, but one case challenged the limits of these accommodations. An employee claimed he couldn’t work certain hours because he was a vampire. While it may sound like the plot of a sitcom, the incident led to his dismissal and a debate on what constitutes reasonable accommodation. Being treated differently or less favourably because you are a vampire is not covered in the various equal opportunity acts.

11. The Facebook “Like”

Social media use continues to be a hot topic in employment law, and one case that pushed the boundaries involved an employee who was dismissed for simply ‘liking’ a Facebook post critical of his employer. The dismissal raised significant legal questions around freedom of speech and how far employers can go in monitoring and acting on an employee’s social media activity.

12. Gum-Chewing Dismissal

What might seem like a minor infraction to some became grounds for dismissal in a peculiar case where an employee was sacked for chewing gum during a training session. The employer considered this a sign of disrespect and lack of attention, leading to the employee’s dismissal. The case spawned debates about the level of formality and behavioural expectations in different work environments.

13. Virtual Reality Assault

The advent of new technology always brings new challenges, and virtual reality (VR) is no exception. During a VR team-building exercise, an employee was sacked for “assaulting” a virtual character that was controlled by a co-worker. This unique case raised questions about the lines between virtual actions and real-world consequences, especially as VR technology becomes more integrated into the workplace.

14. Sleeping on the Job

Falling asleep on the job is generally considered unacceptable, but the stakes are much higher in some professions. An air traffic controller was dismissed for falling asleep while on duty, putting countless lives at risk. The case led to a wide-scale investigation into working conditions and the human factors affecting performance in high-stakes roles.

15. Political Affiliation

While political discussions are often discouraged in the workplace, one individual found himself fired for having a political bumper sticker that his manager didn’t like. This case raised ethical questions about the extent to which employers can control or be influenced by the political beliefs of their employees.

16. The 420 Character Resignation

In a country where marijuana is illegal, an employee was fired after submitting a 420-character resignation letter on April 20—commonly known as “Weed Day.” The company interpreted this as a drug reference, leading to his immediate dismissal. This dismissal opened a discussion about the subtleties of language and cultural references in professional settings.

17. Jury Duty Dismissal

Civic responsibilities sometimes clash with job duties, as seen in a case where an employee was fired for taking an “excessive” amount of time on jury duty. After legal battles, the employee was reinstated, as dismissing someone for fulfilling jury duty obligations is generally illegal in the United States (and Australia). The case served as a reminder of the protections offered to employees who take time off for civic duties.

18. Phantom Employee

One of the most audacious cases involves an Italian man who was absent from his government job for 15 years without being noticed. Upon discovery, he was immediately dismissed and faced criminal charges. This unbelievable situation led to a complete revaluation of attendance monitoring and accountability in the workplace.

18 dismissal cases from around Australia

19. Emoji Miscommunication – New South Wales

In today’s digital age, an emoji can speak a thousand words—sometimes to an employee’s detriment. A case in New South Wales saw an employee sacked for sending inappropriate emojis via a work communication platform. This dismissal opened up debates on what constitutes professional communication in the digital age and led to companies revisiting their communication policies.

20. Snack Theft – Victoria

In Victoria, an employee found themselves without a job over the theft of a $1 bag of chips from the office pantry. While theft is indeed a serious offense, (considered serious misconduct under the Fair Work Act 2009) this case ignited discussions on proportionality, questioning whether the punishment was justifiable given the low monetary value of the theft.

21. Animal Distraction – Queensland

A Queensland-based employee was dismissed for persistently bringing a pet to the workplace, despite repeated warnings. The employee argued that their pet helped them focus better. This led to ongoing dialogues on the role of pets in workplaces and when they become a distraction rather than an aid.

22. Impersonating a Boss – South Australia

In South Australia, an employee was sacked for sending company-wide emails impersonating their boss. Though done for humour, the act was deemed inappropriate and led to immediate dismissal.This case highlights the importance of maintaining professionalism, even when the line between jest and propriety seems blurred.

23. False Sick Leave – Western Australia

“Calling in sick” took a devious twist in a Western Australia case where an employee claimed sick leave but was actually vacationing. Their public social media posts gave them away, and they were promptly fired. This incident served as a cautionary tale against abusing trust and the misrepresentation of leave entitlements.

24. Sacked for a Selfie – Tasmania

An employee in Tasmania lost their job after taking a selfie with a celebrity client of their employer, breaching confidentiality agreements. The case drew attention to the limits of personal freedoms when in a professional setting and how the lines between public and private can blur in the age of social media.

25. Political Bumper Sticker – Victoria

Another case from Victoria featured an employee who was fired for sporting a political bumper sticker that didn’t align with the employer’s views. The case raised ethical questions regarding whether an employer should have any say over an employee’s personal political affiliations.

26. Bad Online Review – New South Wales

The digital age provides multiple platforms to vent frustrations, including job review sites. An employee in New South Wales learned this the hard way when they were fired for posting a negative review of their own company. This led to debates about the extent to which employers can regulate or respond to employees’ online activities.

27. TV Show Spoilers – Queensland

Spoilers are unwelcome in most settings but can be especially so in the workplace. In a Queensland case, an employee was dismissed for deliberately revealing spoilers of a much-awaited TV series episode. While it may seem trivial to some, the case opened conversations on maintaining a respectful work environment.

28. Excessive Toilet Breaks – Western Australia

The importance of reasonable accommodation was questioned in Western Australia when an employee was dismissed for taking too many toilet breaks. The employer cited a decrease in productivity as the reason for ending his employment. However, this raised questions about workplace wellness and what accommodations are reasonable or required under law.

29. Instagram Overload – South Australia

In South Australia, an employee was let go for using Instagram excessively during work hours. The employee argued they were promoting the company, but the employer disagreed, leading to their termination. This case highlights the Gray area surrounding personal social media use for purported work-related activities.

30. Calling in “Bored” – Victoria

In a case that perplexed many, a Victoria-based employee was terminated after calling in “bored.” The employer took this as a sign of disengagement and lack of commitment, resulting in immediate dismissal. The case served as an example of how honesty may not always be the best policy, especially if it indicates a lack of professionalism.

31. Coffee Shop Wi-Fi – New South Wales

Technology can be a point of contention in any workplace. In this New South Wales case, an employee was fired for consistently using a nearby coffee shop’s Wi-Fi for work, arguing it was faster than the office connection. The employer considered this a security risk and grounds for dismissal. This case raised questions about data security and responsible technology use in professional settings.

32. Social Media Firing – Tasmania

Another Tasmania case featured an employee who was dismissed after posting a parody of their boss on social media. Despite being done outside of work hours, the employer viewed it as conduct unbecoming, leading to the employee’s termination. This case threw light on the reach of an employer’s jurisdiction over an employee’s personal online activities.

33. Fantasy Football Firing – Queensland

Work-life balance was put to the test in a Queensland case where an employee was dismissed for managing a fantasy football league during work hours. The dismissal led to a debate over how much personal activity is acceptable during work hours and what crosses the line into time-wasting or a lack of productivity.

34. Cultural Sensitivity Training – Victoria

In another case from Victoria, an employee was dismissed for refusing to attend mandatory cultural sensitivity training. Citing it against their personal beliefs, the employee’s refusal led to their firing. The case became a focal point for discussions around the limitations of personal beliefs when they interfere with workplace requirements.

35. Moonlighting Madness – Western Australia

Moonlighting can sometimes lead to conflicts of interest, and that was evident in a Western Australia case where an employee was fired for running a personal business during work hours. Not only were they managing their business, but they were also taking business calls while on the clock. This led to discussions about the conflict of interest and the fair division of professional attention.

36. Mismatched Socks – South Australia

In one of the most peculiar cases, an employee in South Australia was terminated for wearing mismatched socks, which was deemed “unprofessional” by their employer. While the dismissal may seem harsh, it raised legitimate questions about workplace dress codes and how far employers can go in enforcing them.

Conclusion: 36 Crazy Dismissal Cases to ponder

From emoji mishaps to issues of digital security, and from personal beliefs clashing with professional expectations to the nuances of online activity, Australia has seen its fair share of boundary pushing dismissal cases. These examples underline the complexity of employment law in Australia, which varies from state to state and territory to territory. They also serve as cautionary tales for both employers and employees, highlighting the importance of clear communication, mutual respect, and a shared understanding of acceptable behaviour in the workplace. The Fair work Commission decisions are regularly reported online or on TV.

These 36 cases remind us of the ever-changing landscape of employment law and the need for constant vigilance and adaptation in the face of technological advancements and evolving social norms. (you cannot criterize anybody these days). It’s safe to say that the line between personal freedom and professional conduct is more blurred than ever, making the world of work a complex minefield.

We at A Whole New Approach are not lawyers, nor do we want to be. We are Australia’s leading representatives and commentors on anything to do with the workplace. All Fair Work Commission matters, including being forced to resign or around casual employee rights call us immediatly.

1800 333 666, its a free, prompt, confidential call

Similar cases to: 36 Crazy Dismissal Cases to ponder

Fighting at work 4 shocking cases

Excising your workplace rights

What is my unfair dismissal claim worth